Seen this?

A bit simplistic… but still a good read!

Result opens heated debate! :smiley:

How can he say the 177 and 190 S1 Exiges are so different?

ref : lap times …

exige 190 beaten by standard elise s2 (120 hp), huh, that cant be right ?

[quote=DSE]ref : lap times …

exige 190 beaten by standard elise s2 (120 hp), huh, that cant be right ? [/quote]

Look in the small print… Captain Slow in the 190, the Stig in the 120 :smiley:

Most of that is chuff in my experience, must be very biased as to the drivers and their abilities, I had a sport160 and drove it endlessly on track and only ever struggled against Exige’s and 340R, I never found either variant of Elise as good on track or as competitive, I had lightly modified it for improved induction and exhaust flow, and fitted the UCR gearbox but nothing to significantly effect bhp.

I remember reading that at the time and dismissing it as tosh.

Myst have been different conditions or different drivers… ain’t no way a VX220 (N/A) is faster than ANY Exige variant, ever.

I think its all spot on :smiley: owning an S2 Exige :wink:

A very strange article. How comes his comments between a 177 and 190 Exige S1 are so different, All I can tell is the 190 is noisier and needs me to polish the back of the car every time I wash it to get all the black marks off!

Not sure where they got the S1 Sport190 from on a “P” plate it must have been the worst set up car ever to be that slow…

I’ve obviously been wrong about my S1!!!but I’m still not getting an S2.

Julian Bailey - absolutely pants driver, nuff said

I’m off to see my doctor, cos I’m feeling suicidal.