MOT Testers Handbook

Magazine articles featuring members of this BBS, or articles about the cars in general.
stevegreen

MOT Testers Handbook

Post by stevegreen »

web page

Might help settle any debate over what will or will not pass an MOT?

DavidEVO1
Posts: 1094
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Chilterns

Re: MOT Testers Handbook

Post by DavidEVO1 »

Not that we�re likely to be having many of them, �Biannual�, it a joke!

tim_marra
Posts: 4806
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:56 pm
Location: Cumbria
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MOT Testers Handbook

Post by tim_marra »

The RVM must be marginal on the Exige S

stevegreen

Re: MOT Testers Handbook

Post by stevegreen »

Not that we�re likely to be having many of them, �Biannual�, it a joke!
David - enlighten me?

DavidEVO1
Posts: 1094
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Chilterns

Re: MOT Testers Handbook

Post by DavidEVO1 »

Well the government have proposed to scrap yearly MOT�s in favour of biannual testing, which to me at least seems ridiculous.

The thing is, look at the number driving wreaks we see on the road as it is, hell, on my way home today we were damn near asphyxiated by the fumes coming out of the Astra in front; and now cars like that are gonna remain on the roads for twice as long.

The only argument I can see for the scheme is that it�ll be cheaper for the motorists, but surely, less MOT�s are going to mean that garages are going to have to hike their prices due to lack of business.

I can�t quite remember the stat, but something like a third of vehicles fail their MOT�s as it is, and to let that many cars with duff brakes or broken lights stay on the road, well to me at least, seems irresponsible.

David

21GG
Posts: 789
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: Blackpool
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: MOT Testers Handbook

Post by 21GG »

Tim, rvm isnt mandatory if you have at least one wing mirror, otherwise all the vans driving round with solid back doors would be illegal!
Gav

Post Reply